Next week Forterra will release a white paper detailing the results of a joint experiment with members of The Masie Center's Learning Consortium on learning of virtual worlds. The two established a 3D Sandbox for members to explore different use cases for virtual worlds. While the white paper outlines certain challenges to be met, the two final participants, Accenture and ACS Learning Services both saw a great deal of promise. In particular, ACS plans to continue its experiment next month.

"What I think is going to be even more exciting is–I feel that what we did was replicate to a certain degree an instructor experience. In the collaborative environment, I feel the benefit is collaborative learning, almost like Harvard Business School Cases," explained ACS Learning Strategist Caroline Avey. "They go out and find these answers and the facilitator will brief. We plan to trial that in January."

Graph
While the purpose of the study was to examine employee development and training, one extra benefit of the process was identifying virtual worlds, specifically OLIVE, as a cost-effective, richer alternative to other methods of teleconferencing.  Rather than simply dialing into a conference call or setting up elaborate and expensive telepresence systems, users can share a sense of presence from their own computers. [See comparison chart provided by Forterra]

The feel of location boosts learning engagement as well. It allows for what Avey called the "Aha! moments" of discovery and engagement.

"What's exciting to me is in the real world if you did distance learning through some other standard format with slides or people listening, the percentage of people who will disengage is very high. In this environment people hung in there. You can tell, because the avatars start nodding off otherwise. To me the appeal is that everyone noted how quickly the hour went by," explained Avey. "You become engaged in the  content. You become engaged with other people in the room. You're much more aware of the other participants than, say, in a standard broadcast type media. There's much less distance, and you feel physically connected to these people. As a result, there's a sense of bonding."

One complaint pundits often have about virtual worlds as a training environment is the complicated nature of navigating the 3D environment. That's exacerbated, some say, by generation gaps. Younger users take to the systems due to their game-like natures, while older users, often in management, avoid them for the same reasons.

Avey, herself 52, says that the gap isn't as extreme as some think. More importantly, like any technology, if virtual worlds fill a training need, they'll be adopted.

"Think about cell phones, nobody used to have them. Now everyone has them. Cell phones met the need of immediate communication," she explained. "In the case of a 3D environment, what it offers over a 2D environments is the ability to have an interaction that's much more engaging. Why is World of Warcraft more fun than Monopoly?"

The problem is also diminished by repeated use and training. Prior to launching in to training sessions, Forterra and ACS took users to a wide open space, a virtual desert with no distractions, and helped them adjust to their avatars and real-world headsets. The process takes under an hour.

"There is a learning curve, but having these people come back into the world, it goes much faster," said Avey. "There's almost this magic time where initially they're hesitant and then they really get used to it."

The white paper lays out similar instructions and tips for setting up effective virtual world training environments, and is well worth a read for anyone pitching or developing enterprise-level virtual worlds. All involved are still looking ahead, but the early trials and case studies are already showing strong results and, even better, solid ROI opportunities.

In fact, Forterra says its most advanced customer, though unidentified, is already planning on rolling out OLIVE to their 70,000 employees in 2009. The company will employ the virtual world for 5 separate use cases, including replacing at least some conference calling with virtual meetings.

ACS Learning is also looking at other options.

"What we did was a proof of concept. It's taking a technology for a test drive and seeing how far you can push that technology on interactions," said Avey.  "We made a laundry list on what we would hope to accomplish, everything from a presention that might replace a Webex environment to an 'Aha! moment' of two avatars interacting online in a client-customer relationship. The fact that we could have avatars do it and have learners observe was powerful."

Related Articles:

Join us for App Conference – October 18-19, 2012 in Santa Clara

4 Responses to New Study Shows Virtual Worlds Strong on ROI for Training and Collaboration

  1. Phil Duby says:

    Any idea how to contact the designers / organizers of the experiment? It overlaps strongly with some design / thought work I have done.

  2. I would also be interested in a link to the full report– or some discussion of the methodology for the study. Thanks– I look forward to reading more about the findings and how they were obtained!

  3. Joey Seiler says:

    I believe Forterra is planning on publishing the full study tomorrow on their website. So keep an eye out there and then.

  4. len says:

    “…one extra benefit of the process was identifying virtual worlds, specifically OLIVE, as a cost-effective, richer alternative to other methods of teleconferencing.”
    I am interested if the white paper tells us something we don’t already know: real-time 3D worlds are more engaging than real-time video. If instead the paper is a thin set of numbers and a lot of why OLIVE is the best product, then the white paper goes in the heap with the white papers from studies sponsored by the pharmaceutical industry.